A Racist False Witness. A Rogue Judge. A Legal Travesty. Tell the Michigan Supreme Court to Make This Right.
In the simple matter of enforcing a straightforward lease, a jury decided the evidence was clear and rendered a verdict – along with a monetary award to make whole the party whose rights had been violated.
The judge signed off. It should have ended there.
But a deep-pocketed national competitor couldn’t accept that it had lost, and conscripted a racist, conspiracy-mongering, disgruntled ex-employee to make outlandish claims about the winning side. They ran to a judge who didn’t even have jurisdiction over the case – a move that should have been laughed out of the court.
But it wasn’t. And the events that followed created one of the most absurd injustices in the history of Michigan jurisprudence.
Join us in demanding that the Michigan Supreme Court make this right.
16 April 2024 | International Outdoor Inc.
International Outdoor Has Made Its Case to the Justices. We Want You to Read It Too.
Here Is Our Reply to the Decisions That Have Been Made to Date
We Appreciate Their Support. You Will Find Their Arguments Compelling.
THE RACIST, FALSE WITNESS, PATRICK DEPA. AND HIS LIES: What Kind of Judge Would Throw Out a Jury Verdict Based On An Affidavit From a Person Like This? DID PATRICK DEPA COMMIT PERJURY? READ AND DECIDE.
A Stunning Paper Trail of Lies from a Man Judge Anderson and the Court of Appeals Simply Took At His Word
You don't have to go far into Patrick Depa's paper trail to see that no one should take him at his word about anything. But don't just take it from us. See the documentation for yourself.
Racist and Sexist Emails from Patrick Depa in the Workplace
If you had an employee you found to be sending e-mails like these, you would immediately terminate that person.
Patrick Depa Harrasses Fellow Employees With Inappropriate, Conspiracy-Mongering Emails
The things that go through this man's mind, and he says them to others. Who would take this guy seriously?
Transcript: Depa's Claims Fall Apart Under Examination
Judge Anderson did not allow Patrick Depa's credibility to be challenged through discovery, but look how easy it was to destroy the claims in his affidavit just by noting facts.
JUDICIAL ABUSE OF DISCRETION: How Can a Process Be Called Fair When the Rules Are Manipulated to Favor One Side?
Ignoring the Court of Appeals . . . and Getting Away With It
The Court of Appeals told Judge Anderson she did not have jurisdiction in the case. That should have ended things right there. But she didn't care, and amazingly, they let her get away with it.
Only One Side Gets to Have An Expert Involved With Examining a Key Piece of Evidence?
Lamar wanted to inspect Randy Oram's computer and use its own comptuer expert. Judge Anderson said yes. International Outdoor wanted its own expert involved with the process. Judge Anderson said no.
About That 'Witness Intimidation' Claim . . .
All it took was a little questioning to demonstrate that was big nothingburger (see pages 143 through 146), but Judge Anderson still used it as her excuse not to allow discovery.
No Discovery Because the Judge Won't Allow It?
When the attorneys for International Outdoor wanted to subject Randy Oram to discovery to test his credibility, Judge Anderson said no.
LAMAR/SS MITX ATTORNEYS' ABUSE OF PROCESS: Attorneys Are Not Supposed to Present 'Evidence' They Know Is False, and Helped to Manufacture . . . But That's What Happened Here
Staged Computer Inspection, With Only One Side Allowed an Expert
Lamar’s attorneys asked for a fishing expedition into International Outdoor’s computer system, then dug deeper into those drives than the court allowed.
Lamar's Attorneys Lied About When They First Started Collaborating With Patrick Depa
The paper trail proves it.
Their Own Billing Records Prove the Real Timeline
It's tough to cover up a lie when your own invoices prove when you really got involved with your lying, racist "witness."
Clear Terms of Lease Violated
SS MITX cut International Outdoor out of a lease on their land in Auburn Hills to favor Lamar Advertising, but the verbiage of the lease shows that even if there was a problem, International had the ability to cure the problem.
WHO IS JUDGE MARTHA ANDERSON? Biased, And Eventually Removed By the Supreme Court From Hearing Cases On the Business Docket
The Michigan Supreme Court Removed Her From the Business Docket
The Justices could clearly see the problems with Judge Anderson hearing business cases.
How Many Times Can One Judge Get Reversed?
In Judge Anderson's case, the track record is disturbing.
An Undisclosed Business Relationship Between the Judge's Husband and the Other Side's Attorneys
No wonder Judge Martha Anderson was so biased in favor of the attorneys from Altior Law P.C. formerly known as NEUMAN ANDERSON GREICO MCKENNEY, P.C. According to the other lawyers, Judge Martha Anderson’s husband has used their offices for his mediation work.
Judge Anderson's Poor Performance Didn't Start With This Case
There's a track record of media articles that show she's the wrong person for the job.